|
|
Post by Game Master on Jan 9, 2007 1:31:44 GMT -5
Hey should I add more info to the Adventure descriptions such as Time: short/medium/long/campaign or difficulty level or suggested # of party members? Right now I just have info you as characters would learn. What do you all (both) think?
|
|
|
|
Post by homeskillet on Jan 9, 2007 22:41:32 GMT -5
I like it the way you are doing now. It saves on time, space and it keeps things a little generic. That way if something is chosen, that's when more information is revealed. It's like reading the Classifieds. You really don't know what your getting into until you get the interview.
|
|
|
|
Post by Game Master on Jan 10, 2007 3:19:25 GMT -5
OK, that works for me. I wanted to see what you two wanted. Hey, welcome to Vagabond status.
|
|
|
|
Post by homeskillet on Jan 10, 2007 21:20:13 GMT -5
Yeah, I am a vagabond. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by sfliegel on Jan 27, 2007 21:47:49 GMT -5
i posted thisunder another section, but i think that ranking adventures, by duration, difficulty, and suggested number of characters is a good idea. The descriptions may be a little misleading and before you know it you're over your head and might lose a character.
|
|
